Who Wrote the Letter to the Hebrews? To whom was it addressed?
In this article I shall endeavor to answer the two
following questions: Who wrote the letter to the Hebrews? To whom was it
addressed?
Who Wrote the Letter?
Various opinions are held by conservative scholars as
to who the human author of this epistle was. Some think Paul wrote it, but
others are of the opinion that Barnabas did it. Still others think that Apollos
was the author. No one can be dogmatic on this point. For years I was in a
quandary as to who the human author was. Of late, however, I have arrived at
what I think is the correct conclusion.
I am now of the opinion that the Apostle Paul was the
author. There are two reasons which have led me to this decision. The
salutation of the recognized Pauline epistles is practically the same in each
letter. The Book of Hebrews ends with a similar salutation. My second reason
for believing that Paul probably was the author is found in Peter's statement
(II Peter 3:15), in which passage the Apostle said that Paul had written a
letter to those to whom he sent his epistle. From II Peter 3:1 we see that this
is a second epistle sent to this group. From I Peter 1:1,2 we learn that the
Apostle's first epistle was sent to Hebrew Christians in the Dispersion
scattered throughout certain provinces in central Asia Minor. We therefore know
that Peter's epistles were sent to these Hebrew believers.
Peter says that the Apostle Paul wrote in an epistle
to these same people things that were hard to be understood. From this
statement, we see that Paul wrote a special letter to the Hebrews and that
these Jewish believers to whom Peter wrote likewise were the recipients of an
epistle from Paul. Everyone who studies the letter to the Hebrews knows that it
contains many things hard to be understood. All of the Pauline epistles were directed
to certain definite groups or persons concerning whom we have definite
knowledge. Since the Lord sent an epistle through Paul to the Hebrews, since
our present epistle contains things that are hard to understand, since it was
written to Hebrews, and since there are no other known epistles of the Apostle
that would meet these conditions, I conclude that the Holy Spirit chose Paul to
write this one. Though the evidence is not absolute and positive, it is very
strong; and, in the absence of negative evidence, one can entertain logically
the thought that probably the Apostle Paul wrote this letter.
After all, it does not matter so very much as to who
was chosen by the Spirit as the human author (though we do like to know). When
we know that a document was written by the Holy Spirit, as we are confident
this one was, we receive it with all gratitude and endeavor by God's grace to
understand its message.
To Whom Was the Letter Addressed?
To whom was the letter addressed? This question is
answered differently by various scholars. The consensus of opinion, however, so
far as I am able to ascertain is that it was sent to a given community of
Hebrew believers who were discouraged and who were at the point of abandoning
Christianity and going back to Judaism. There is much in the epistle that
favors this view. On the other hand, there is much evidence which points to a
different conclusion. There are those who are of the opinion that the epistle
was addressed to the entire Jewish nation in the late sixties of the first
century and constituted an appeal to the Jewish race to accept Christ
immediately. There is much in favor of this position. All the evidence which I
have been able to gather seems most positively, to me at least, to point in
this direction.
There can be little doubt that the epistle was sent
directly by the Apostle to a given community of Hebrew Christians who needed
encouragement. While they were the immediate recipients of the message, God
used them to start the epistle on the way to the entire nation of Israel. This
was the regular way God started the books of the New Testament on their
historic missions. For instance, the Roman letter was written by Paul to the
church in the city by that name. By it the epistle was given circulation among
all of the churches throughout the world of that day and time. What was true of
the Roman epistle is also true of the other epistles and letters of the New
Testament. In the same manner we can logically conclude that the Hebrew letter
was sent first to this community of Hebrew believers and thus was started on
its way to the entire nation and to the church of God.
Let us remember that the gospel was preached first in
Jerusalem, next in Judea then in Samaria; and finally it went forth to the four
corners of the globe. The apostolic preachers, following the instructions of
our Lord, thus went forth and gave the gospel to the world in the first
generation of the church, proclaiming it first to the Jews and then to the
Gentiles of each community. For proof that it was preached to the entire world,
see Romans 10:18 and Colossians 1:6,23.
In Acts 3 the Apostle Peter called upon the nation of
Israel to repent of their rejection of Jesus and to accept Him personally in
order that God might send the seasons of refreshing from His presence, and that
He might send the Messiah to them, even Jesus. But the nation did not heed. In
the late sixties of that century, it seems that God gave the final call to the
race. It went forth in the form of this epistle (let us in this connection
remember the facts that were presented in the former article of this series).
The Hebrew believers were in very close and intimate connection with
unbelieving Hebrews; thus the message of the epistle would go immediately from
the believers to the unbelievers of the given locality to which the epistle was
first sent; and from them it would go forth unto the whole Jewish race, as the
Hebrew Christians were zealous to make the message known to their unbelieving
brethren.
In chapter 1 the Apostle presented the divine nature
of the Lord Jesus Christ. Then he urged them to give the more earnest heed to
the things which had been heard lest haply they might drift away from them. We
should notice the fact that the message had been heard but presumably not
heeded, because there was a great possibility of their drifting away, as a
ship, that is not anchored.
Further confirmation of this position is seen in
the participle of the original text rendered in verse 3 as, “if we neglect so
great a salvation.” The verb from which this participle is derived literally
means “it is a care.” Later the verb took on a personal character and was used
as other verbs in the various persons. This word is here prefixed by the
negative and, of course, indicates the opposite from caring for. It therefore
came to mean “not caring for; not being interested in; not paying attention
to.” In Matthew 22:5 it is rendered “they made light of it.” The guests invited
to the marriage feast of the king did not care for the invitation. On the
contrary, they made light of it. This very word is used in this passage to
indicate such an attitude. In Hebrews 8:9 God said that He regarded Israel not,
because she refused to walk in His ways. The word under discussion is in this
latter passage rendered “regarded not.” In view of the fact that those to whom
the epistle was written had heard but were in danger of drifting away, and in
view of the further fact that they were not concerned with the message
especially, which they had heard, I come to the conclusion that it was written
to the entire Jewish nation, all of which had been evangelized at the time of
the writing of the epistle. Only a few had accepted.
In 3:1 the Apostle urged his readers to consider Jesus
as Apostle and High Priest of the Jewish faith, “our confession.” The readers
had heard the message, had not been interested in it; had neglected considering
it. The Apostle therefore urges them to consider Jesus in two aspects: First as
Apostle sent from heaven by the Lord to them, and secondly as Jewish High
Priest. This language would not have been appropriate if addressed to Hebrew
believers, for they could say that they had considered and had accepted Jesus
as God's Apostle and their High Priest.
No comments:
Post a Comment